Article 17

Article 17 of the Indian Constitution is a fundamental right enshrined in Part III, aimed at eradicating the inhuman and discriminatory practice of untouchability. It embodies the ideals of equality, dignity, and social justice.


Text of Article 17

“Untouchability is abolished and its practice in any form is forbidden. The enforcement of any disability arising out of untouchability shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.”


Key Features of Article 17

  1. Abolition of Untouchability
    • The article unequivocally declares that untouchability is abolished, meaning it has no place in society, legally or socially.
    • The term untouchability is not explicitly defined in the Constitution but refers to the social practice where certain castes were deemed “untouchable” and excluded from mainstream society.
  2. Prohibition of Practice
    • Any act that enforces untouchability in any form is illegal.
    • Discrimination, exclusion, or denial of services based on untouchability is forbidden.
  3. Punishable Offence
    • The article mandates that any violation related to untouchability is punishable under the law.
Practice of Untouchability violation of  article 17

Legislative Measures to Enforce Article 17

To give effect to Article 17, Parliament enacted the following laws:

  1. Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 (Originally Untouchability (Offences) Act, 1955)
    • Penalizes acts of untouchability, such as denying access to public places, services, or educational institutions.
    • Provides for imprisonment and fines for offenders.
  2. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
    • Strengthens measures to prevent atrocities against SCs and STs, including acts related to untouchability.
    • Establishes special courts for quick trial of offences.

Judicial Interpretations

  1. State of Karnataka v. Appa Balu Ingale (1993)
    • The Supreme Court held that untouchability in any form violates human dignity and Article 17, irrespective of whether it involves SCs or non-SCs.
  2. Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala (Sabarimala Case, 2018)
    • The Court observed that exclusion based on social practices like untouchability, even under religious guise, is unconstitutional.

Scope of Article 17

  1. Universal Application:
    • Article 17 applies to all citizens and non-citizens, irrespective of caste, religion, or gender.
  2. Social Practices:
    • It targets not just caste-based untouchability but also modern forms of social discrimination.

Significance of Article 17

  1. Social Justice and Equality
    • Upholds the constitutional vision of an inclusive and egalitarian society by eliminating caste-based discrimination.
  2. Empowerment of Marginalized Groups
    • Ensures equal access to public spaces, resources, and opportunities for traditionally oppressed communities.
  3. Deterrence through Punishment
    • Criminalizing untouchability acts as a deterrent and ensures accountability for violators.

Challenges in Implementation

  1. Persistence of Caste Discrimination
    • Despite constitutional safeguards, untouchability and caste-based biases persist in rural and urban India.
  2. Ineffective Enforcement
    • Laws like the Protection of Civil Rights Act often face weak enforcement and low conviction rates.
  3. Social Mindsets
    • Deep-rooted prejudices and socio-cultural factors hinder complete eradication.

Examples of Violations

  • Denial of access to wells, temples, or schools to members of lower castes.
  • Practices such as barring SCs/STs from dining with higher castes or participating in cultural events.

Conclusion

Article 17 is a landmark provision that abolishes one of the most inhuman practices, marking a step toward social transformation and equality. However, achieving its true intent requires strong legal enforcement, social awareness, and efforts to change entrenched mindsets. The article stands as a pillar of India’s commitment to dignity and justice for all citizens.

Leave a Reply